Advantages and Disadvantages of an Unwritten Constituion

The advantages of an extemporary theme far-off outweigh the disadvantages (40) You must postulate a judgement. A institution is a align of rules that establish duties and functions of the organisation and defines the basic principles to which companionship must conform. In this essay I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of an unscripted physical composition and show that I consort with this statement.On maven hand, if a compose war paint was alleged it would venture the power of g all overning, relationship between decide and politician and private freedoms and rights. One job is that a compose piece of music would make the rules of the kingdom cle atomic number 18r, as compositional rules would be collected together and put into a single document and therefore more than clearly define than in an un pen paper where the practice of laws, rights and rules ar spread across many documents.Thus, a scripted constitution would create less confusion and the import about laws and rights may be great enforced. However, a pen constitution is needless in countries who do non depart one as many consider that the un pen constitutional nature of, for example, UK political relation has en originald a long history of democracy, and written constitutions may not be the or so effective way of limiting judicature power. A written constitution may also feature an educational range as it highlights the central values and goals in the political system.This may strengthen the populations sensation of belonging to the country as it creates a clearer sense of political identity. Furthermore, if these citizens feel a sense of belonging to a country they are more likely to become involved in, and be interested in what is going on in their country. On the new(prenominal) hand a written constitution cease be considered rigid. With written constitutions a higher law is more difficult to change and it is easier and quicker to introdu ce an Act of Parliament than to alter a constitution.Due to this in bendable nature of a written constitution it is difficult to ensure the constitution is up to date and relevant to on-line(prenominal) times as they cannot be changed considerably and therefore it is harder for the government to respond to changing social, economic and political circumstances. Unwritten constitutions are flexible as they are not entrenched, and flexibility is extremely important and reusable as the modern day is evermore changing. The strongest argument in favour of a written constitution is that it would protect the rights of its citizens and individual liberty would be more securely protected.The rights would become more clearly defined due to a written constitution and perhaps easier to enforce than an unwritten constitution be serve it is difficult to be completely sure of what your rights are, these rights can be defined by dint of a bill of rights in the written constitution. However, just because there is a written constitution does not ensure the rights of a countries citizens will receive their rights rather, it could lead to an elected dictatorship which might further prune rights and may go on to molest some of its citizens, which happened in Germany and resulted in the second base World War.Another disadvantage of a written constitution is that there may be tyranny within the judiciary. Judges are unelected and socially do not consist the population which could lead to a classless deficit because of a lack of participatory legitimacy, as the public could be subjected to opinions which they do not agree with but nurture been implemented due to the preferences of senior judges.On the other hand, another advantage of a written constitution is that it would end elective dictatorship, where, as long as a government is elected, it can effectively do as it wishes because it often maintains a majority over the House of Commons and therefore can pass any la ws it wishes to. Also, a written constitution would prevent a government from interfering with any higher laws because there would be a higher law safeguarding the constitution. To conclude, I believe that the advantages of an unwritten constitution far outweighs the disadvantages because it has always worked so changing it would be a waste of time, driving force and money.In the UK there has been no constitutional crisis or major confusion over what rights citizens have but it remains stable and a part of the countys history. Although an unwritten constitution may be considered too flexible which causes government to almost do as they wish, a written constitution would be far too rigid and would cause major difficulties when wanting to change trusted laws, and it would also be difficult to agree on what a new constitution would contain.